By Pamreihor Khashimwo
Introduction
In a rare and strikingly honest interview with RK Production Channel on August 21, 2024, Ram Muivah, Member of the Legislative Assembly, 44-AC, Ukhrul, Manipur, broke his characteristic quietude to uncover the deep-seated issues plaguing the state. Known for his tact, humility, and a commendable willingness to sacrifice personal gain for the greater good, Muivah’s interview is a watershed moment in the political discourse of Manipur. In a political landscape often dominated by rhetoric and superficial promises, his interview serves not just as an avowal but as an indictment of the unfairness that plagues Manipur’s developmental policies.
Ram Muivah’s People-Centric and Honest Politics
In stark contrast to the self-serving and discriminatory politics of the dominant class and other elected leaders of tribal communities, Muivah’s approach to politics is characterized by a deep commitment to the welfare of his people. His interview is replete with examples of his people-centric approach, where the needs and aspirations of the people take precedence over political expediency.
His decision to focus on education, infrastructure development, and healthcare in Ukhrul, despite the lack of support from the state government, is a testament to his dedication to his people. His honesty and transparency in dealing with his constituents have earned him the respect and admiration of the people. His actions are guided by a sense of duty and responsibility to his people, rather than the pursuit of power or personal gain. His honest and people-centric approach to politics offers valuable lessons in advocacy and governance. By focusing on the real needs of his constituents and challenging systemic biases, he exemplifies a model of leadership that prioritizes the welfare of the people over political expediency.
Muivah’s candidness and willingness to address uncomfortable truths make his interview a significant contribution to the ongoing discourse on political reform and social justice in Manipur. His voice adds a vital dimension to the conversation about how to address the systemic issues that have long plagued the tribal communities.
Lessons for Tribal Leaders and Political Officials
Muivah’s approach to politics offers valuable lessons for tribal leaders and political officials alike. His emphasis on humility, sacrifice, and a people-first approach sets him apart in a political landscape often characterized by corruption and self-interest. Tribal leaders, in particular, can learn from Muivah’s example by prioritizing the needs of their communities and advocating for their rights, even in the face of opposition from the dominant political class in the state. His interview also serves as a wake-up call for political officials to reassess their approach to governance. The state’s leadership must recognize that the continued marginalization of tribal communities is not only unjust but also unsustainable. The long-term stability and prosperity of Manipur depend on the inclusion and empowerment of all its people, regardless of their ethnic or regional background.
A Call for People-Centric Politics
Throughout the interview, he emphasizes the need for a shift towards people-centric politics. Muivah advocates for a more inclusive approach to governance, one that prioritizes the welfare of marginalized communities. This call for inclusivity is not just a political statement but a moral imperative. The disparities in development between the valley and the hill districts are not just a matter of policy failure but of human rights. The people of Ukhrul and other tribal areas have the same rights to water, education, and healthcare as those in Imphal. By highlighting these issues, he is not just criticizing the government but advocating for a more just and equitable society.
The Broader Implications for Manipur’s Future
Muivah’s interview raises important questions about the future of Manipur. The state is at a crossroads, where the decisions made today will have long-lasting implications for its social and political fabric. The continued marginalization of the tribal communities threatens to deepen the divides within the state, leading to further instability and conflict. However, Muivah’s message is ultimately one of hope. He believes that change is possible, but it requires a fundamental shift in the state’s approach to governance. This shift must start with recognizing the legitimate grievances of the tribal communities and addressing them through concrete actions rather than empty promises.
Conclusion
Ram Muivah’s interview is a powerful indictment of the systemic biases and discrimination that have long plagued Manipur’s development. His revelations serve as a reminder that true progress cannot be achieved through the marginalization of any community. As Manipur looks to the future, it is imperative that the state’s leadership takes heed of Muivah’s message and works towards building a more inclusive and equitable society.
His people-centric and honest politics offer a blueprint for change, one that prioritizes the welfare of the people over political expediency. It is a call to action for tribal leaders to rise above the petty politics of division and work towards a common goal of prosperity for all. The time has come for Manipur to shed its legacy of discrimination and embrace a new era of fairness and justice for all its citizens. Muivah’s approach serves as a beacon for other leaders and representatives, demonstrating how integrity and dedication to people can drive positive change. As Manipur navigates its complex socio-political landscape, the lessons drawn from Muivah’s discourse will undoubtedly play a crucial role in shaping a more equitable and just future for all its communities.
(The writer can be reached at khashimwo.jnu@gmail.com. )
